the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

STF Judges Deliberate on Investigation Into Justice Alexandre de Moraes and Banker Daniel Vorcaro

7 sources · Brazil

Who reported this

  • G1 Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Globo (Marinho family)
  • Piaui Brazil · Centre-left · Editora Alvinegra
  • UOL Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Folha
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Estadao Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Estado (Mesquita family)
  • Gazeta do Povo Brazil · Centre-right · Grupo Paranaense de Comunicacao

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from Brazil.

The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) is holding a session to decide whether to open a formal investigation into Justice Alexandre de Moraes regarding his alleged relationship with former Banco Master owner Daniel Vorcaro. The proceedings follow a Federal Police report that identified messages and contracts linking the justice and his family to the banker. Justice Edson Fachin, the president of the court, opened the session by emphasizing the need for institutional independence and serenity during what he described as a difficult period for the court. Justice Moraes has denied the allegations, calling the claims a mounted farce and a political revenge plot by allies of former President Jair Bolsonaro. He specifically denied exchanging messages with Vorcaro and argued that the investigation conducted by Justice André Mendonça was illegal.

The controversy has expanded to include other members of the court. Justice Kassio Nunes Marques declared himself impeded from the judgment after messages from Vorcaro's phone mentioned alleged monthly payments of 500,000 reais to the justice's son, Kevin Marques. Kevin Marques denied receiving these funds from Vorcaro, stating his legal work for a consultancy firm had no relation to the STF. Additionally, messages indicate that Vorcaro sought access to Justice André Mendonça through various intermediaries and was invited to events hosted by an institute founded by Mendonça. Justice Mendonça is currently the rapporteur for the investigation into Banco Master.

Center right outlets frame the event as a necessary exercise in accountability and a moment of institutional crisis, highlighting the contradiction between Moraes' past statements on judicial integrity and the current allegations. Center left outlets focus on the procedural aspects of the case and the specific allegations involving the families of multiple justices. Center outlets provide a more descriptive account of the legal arguments and the broader context of Vorcaro's business dealings, including his past partnership in a betting company.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Focuses on the procedural details of the STF session and the specific allegations involving the children of justices.
Centre
Provides a neutral descriptive account of the legal arguments and Vorcaro's external business ties.
Centre-right
Frames the situation as a crisis of legitimacy and a necessary demand for accountability for the justices.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.