University of Cambridge to Review Senior Hiring Process Following Resignation of Professor Jason Arday
5 sources across 3 countries · United Kingdom · Germany · Singapore · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- The Guardian
- The Independent
- Financial Times
- Der Spiegel
- The Straits Times
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
The University of Cambridge has announced a review of its hiring process for senior academic roles following the resignation of Professor Jason Arday. Arday, who was appointed in 2023 as the university's youngest black professor, resigned with immediate effect on August 5. The university confirmed it will continue to investigate the circumstances of his appointment and tenure, and its Research Policy Committee will review misconduct in research policy. These actions follow allegations that Arday plagiarized parts of his PhD thesis and other research, as well as questions regarding the veracity of personal claims in his biography. Arday admitted to mistakes in his academic work in an interview with The Times, but he denied being an academic fraud and stated that the campaign to remove him was racially motivated. In his resignation letter, he said stepping away was the only way to end a difficult period, though he maintained that his decision should not be seen as an acceptance of the narratives surrounding him. Jesus College, where Arday was a fellow, is also launching its own probe. A group of nearly 100 Cambridge academics has called for an independent investigation into the appointment process and the university's handling of the situation. These academics expressed concern that the controversy and accompanying media coverage have unleashed toxic and racist commentary that could deter black scholars from applying to the university. Some commentators and right wing media outlets have framed Arday as a poster boy for diversity, equality, and inclusion policies. While an investigation at Liverpool John Moores University previously cleared Arday of wrongdoing, the current situation has sparked a wider debate about the intersection of academic integrity and anti racism efforts in higher education.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- These outlets emphasized the risk of racist backlash against black academics and the demand for transparency from university staff.
- Centre
- This outlet focused on the institutional review of the appointments process and the plagiarism allegations.
- Centre-right
- This outlet highlighted the role of diversity policies and the specific origins of the plagiarism claims.
Sources
- Centre-left Der Spiegel: Jason Arday: Has the University of Cambridge been fooled by an impostor?
- Centre Financial Times: Cambridge university to review appointments process after Jason Arday affair
- Centre-left The Guardian: Cambridge academics reject university’s attempt to end row over Jason Arday
- Centre-left The Independent: Cambridge gives update after professor quit amid plagiarism row
- Centre-right The Straits Times: Cambridge to review hiring process amid plagiarism row
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.