US Appeals Court Rules Against Trump Administration's Termination of Climate Grants
3 sources across 3 countries · Qatar · United Kingdom · United States · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- Al Jazeera
- Reuters
- Associated Press
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
A US federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the Trump administration likely acted unlawfully when it attempted to cancel approximately $20 billion in clean energy grants. The ruling concerns the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, a program established by Congress through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act under the Biden administration. The fund was designed to provide federal money to nonprofit organizations to invest in clean energy infrastructure, energy efficient buildings, and small energy projects.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin sought to dismantle the program, citing concerns over fraud, waste, and mismanagement. Zeldin described the fund as an example of government waste and criticized the distribution of tax dollars to what he called far left activist groups. In response, the nonprofit recipients sued, arguing that the administration was illegally withholding funds approved by Congress due to policy disagreements rather than evidence of fraud.
The full US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed a previous decision by a three judge panel that had sided with the administration. The court stated that terminating the grants based solely on a policy disagreement likely violated the Inflation Reduction Act. Despite the ruling, the funds will not be released immediately because the decision has been temporarily put on hold to allow the EPA to seek intervention from the US Supreme Court.
Outlets with a center lean focused on the legal ruling and the court's finding that the administration was wrong to terminate the funds. An outlet with a center left lean framed the decision as a blow to the president's broader effort to dismantle Biden era climate policies.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Framed the ruling as a significant setback to the administration's wider goal of reversing climate policies.
- Centre
- Focused on the legal outcome and the court's determination that the EPA's actions were likely unlawful.
Sources
- Centre-left Al Jazeera: US court deals blow to Trump’s bid to scrap climate grant programme
- Centre Associated Press: Divided federal appeals court says Trump administration was wrong to terminate climate funds - apnews.com
- Centre Reuters: Trump's EPA was wrong to terminate billions in climate grants, US appeals court rules - Reuters
93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.