the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

US House Rejects Republican Effort to Permanently Cap Supreme Court at Nine Justices

3 sources across 3 countries · Indonesia · Qatar · United Kingdom · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Tempo English Indonesia · Centre-left · PT Tempo Inti Media
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The US House of Representatives rejected a Republican backed joint resolution that would have amended the Constitution to permanently limit the Supreme Court to nine justices. The measure failed to reach the required two thirds majority, with a final vote of 212 in favor and 206 against. The vote largely followed party lines, although North Carolina Democrat Don Davis supported the measure and independent Representative Kevin Kiley, who caucuses with Republicans, voted against it.

House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized Democrats for opposing the resolution, stating that defending the integrity of the Supreme Court should not be controversial. The vote occurred one day after the House approved a resolution condemning socialism by a vote of 220 to 192. Some reports suggest these efforts were primarily messaging exercises intended to put Democrats on record ahead of the November midterm elections.

The debate over the court's size follows calls from some Democrats to expand the court to counter its conservative majority, a process critics call court packing. While the current number of justices was set by Congress in 1869, the US Constitution does not specify the size of the court. Historically, the number of justices has changed several times, most notably during a proposal by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 to add justices based on the age of sitting members.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These reports framed the event as part of a broader political debate over the court's conservative majority and provided extensive historical context on court expansion.
Centre
This outlet focused on the outcome of the vote and the partisan divide, framing the event as Democrats sinking a Republican bid.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.