the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

US Judge Overturns Trump Administration Visa Suspension for 75 Nations

8 sources across 6 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Sueddeutsche Zeitung Germany · Centre-left · Sudwestdeutsche Medien Holding
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • The Daily Star Bangladesh · Centre · Mediaworld Ltd
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • Al-Monitor United States · Centre · Jamal Daniel

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A US federal judge in Manhattan has struck down a Trump administration policy that suspended the issuance of immigrant visas to applicants from 75 countries. US District Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled on Friday that the policy, announced by the State Department in January, was patently unlawful and exceeded the statutory authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The judge stated that the policy categorically prohibited visa issuance based on nationality, which represented a direct abrogation of federal immigration law.

The suspension affected applicants from various regions, including South Asian countries such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, Latin American nations including Brazil, Colombia, and Uruguay, as well as several Balkan, African, Middle Eastern, and Caribbean countries. The State Department had defended the measure by claiming that applicants from these nations were at a high risk of becoming a public charge and relying on government resources.

The ruling followed a lawsuit filed by immigrant rights groups, including the Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, as well as visa applicants and US citizens sponsoring family members. Judge Vargas was appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden.

Outlets with a center lean reported the ruling as a legal check on the administration's authority. Center-left sources emphasized the broader context of the administration's crackdown, with some noting previous derogatory comments made by President Trump regarding African nations. Center-right coverage focused on the legal specifics of the ruling while also reporting on other administration developments. The Trump administration has stated that its aggressive immigration measures are intended to improve domestic security, while rights groups argue that such policies violate due process and free speech rights and promote racial profiling.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Highlighted the human rights implications and provided context regarding the president's rhetoric toward African nations.
Centre
Focused on the legal ruling and the specific statutory authority of the Secretary of State.
Centre-right
Reported the legal outcome neutrally while placing it alongside other current administration news.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.