the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

AI Leaders Call for Development Slowdown Amid Warnings of Existential Risk

4 sources across 2 countries · Germany · Switzerland

Who reported this

  • netzpolitik.org Germany · Left · netzpolitik.org e.V., donation funded
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Neue Zuercher Zeitung Switzerland · Centre-right · Dispersed shareholders, no controlling stake

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Leading figures from major artificial intelligence firms are calling for a reduction in the development pace of the most powerful AI models. Dario Amodei, the head of Anthropic, published an essay titled "We Must Pace the Frontier," urging the industry to slow down. This call was publicly supported by OpenAI chief Sam Altman, Tesla and SpaceXAI head Elon Musk, and Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis. These warnings follow a post by Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who claimed the technology could potentially wipe out humanity by the end of the decade. Evan Hubinger of Anthropic estimated the probability of AI causing human extinction in the next decade at over 10 percent.

Recent technical milestones have fueled these concerns. OpenAI reported that 10,000 AI agents cooperated to find a potential solution for the Navier-Stokes equations, one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems. Additionally, AI has recently been used to verify the Jacobi conjecture and solve other long standing mathematical problems. Bill Gates has also expressed concern that governments are not sufficiently addressing AI risks, though he believes the technology can help the world's poorest if handled equitably.

Perspectives on these warnings vary by political lean. Center right sources frame the situation as a critical debate over safety, existential risk, and the need for international regulation, particularly regarding autonomous weapons. However, some center right commentary suggests that AI firms are using doomsday rhetoric as a cynical strategy to hide their own lack of control over the tools or to avoid liability for damages. Left leaning coverage focuses on immediate, tangible harms rather than future catastrophes, such as the use of AI behavior scanners by Berlin police and the sharing of non anonymized data with private companies.

How each side framed it

Left
Framed AI concerns around state surveillance, privacy violations, and the misuse of personal data by private firms.
Centre-left
Focused on the intersection of AI risks and financial market interests.
Centre-right
Framed the issue as a tension between existential safety risks, the need for global regulation of autonomous weapons, and skepticism toward the motives of AI corporations.

Sources

93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.