Al-Qaeda Evolves into Regional Affiliates 25 Years After September 11 Attacks
6 sources across 5 countries
Who reported this
- Le Monde
- Le Monde Afrique
- La Tercera
- The Jerusalem Post
- Business Day
- El Pais
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
As the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks approaches, security experts and government authorities report that while al-Qaeda's central leadership has been severely diminished, the organization has reinvented itself through a network of regional affiliates. The group's original central structure has been weakened by two decades of drone strikes and the deaths of its primary leaders, including founder Osama bin Laden in 2011 and successor Ayman al-Zawahiri in 2022. Egyptian militant Seif al-Adel is currently believed to be the de facto leader of the organization. Some reports suggest al-Adel may be residing under the protection of Iran, reflecting a strategic shift where a Sunni jihadist leader is hosted by a Shia theocracy.
Al-Qaeda's influence has shifted geographically, with its most powerful current branches located in Africa. These include Al Shabaab in Somalia and the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (GSIM) in the Sahel region, covering Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. These African affiliates are noted for their ability to control and administer territories, funding their operations through taxes, gold mining, livestock sales, and kidnapping ransoms.
U.S. authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, have warned that the threat landscape has evolved from centralized international organizations to a more dispersed environment. They note that individuals and small cells now often plan attacks independently, motivated by various ideological goals. In the last 18 months, the FBI has arrested at least 16 people in the U.S. for allegedly planning or supporting attacks on behalf of al-Qaeda or the Islamic State.
Outlets with a center-right lean frame the current situation as a persistent and complex security threat that requires vigilance against both foreign-inspired and domestic terrorism. In contrast, center-left outlets frame the evolution of the group as a sign of the central organization's decline and degradation, while questioning whether the U.S. response to the original attacks contributed to a world where terrorism has become normalized.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- These outlets emphasize the weakening of al-Qaeda's central apparatus and question the long-term efficacy of the U.S. response.
- Centre-right
- These outlets focus on the ongoing threat posed by dispersed cells and the continued danger of foreign-inspired terrorism.
Sources
- Centre-right Business Day: EXPLAINER | What’s happened to al Qaeda in the 25 years since 9/11?
- Centre-left El Pais: Have the terrorists won after 9/11?
- Centre-right La Tercera: U.S. authorities warn that terrorist groups continue encouraging attacks on the country: they spread propaganda related to 9/11
- Centre-left Le Monde: 25 years of September 11: despite the retreat of Al-Qaeda, jihadism prospers and keeps western societies under tension
- Centre-left Le Monde Afrique: From the Sahel to Somalia, how Al-Qaeda is reinventing itself in Africa
- Centre-right The Jerusalem Post: Twenty-five years after the September 11 attacks, what has happened to al-Qaeda? - explainer
90% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.