Brazil's Electoral Court Clears Flávio Bolsonaro of AI Video Penalties and Sets Deepfake Criteria
4 sources · Brazil
Who reported this
- CNN Brasil
- Folha de S.Paulo
- Estadao
- Gazeta do Povo
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Brazil.
The Superior Electoral Court (TSE) voted 4 to 3 on Tuesday to reject a request to fine presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro for using an artificial intelligence avatar of former President Jair Bolsonaro during a party convention in July. The court majority, led by President and rapporteur Kassio Nunes Marques, determined that the video did not constitute irregular early electoral propaganda. The decision followed a challenge by the Brazil Hope Federation, which argued the material violated rules prohibiting deepfakes used to favor or prejudice candidacies.
Beyond the specific case, the TSE established a formal legal thesis to guide the application of rules regarding deepfakes in elections. By a 5 to 2 vote, the court defined an illegal deepfake as synthetic content produced by AI that possesses a degree of realism or verisimilitude and is intended to create or alter the image, voice, or manifestation of a person. The court further ruled that the prohibition of deepfakes only applies when the content is characterized as electoral propaganda. Additionally, the court decided 4 to 3 that the transmission of a party convention via social media does not automatically turn a manifestation of political support into early electoral propaganda; instead, the nature of the act must be analyzed based on context, language, and the intended recipient.
Justice Nunes Marques stated that the rules should be interpreted based on freedom of expression and that the goal is to protect voters from false perceptions of reality. Conversely, dissenting justices, including Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, argued that the prohibition should be objective and not depend on the degree of realism. Justice Cueva contended that the video became illicit once it was broadcast live on social networks.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- These reports focused on the legal reasoning and the broader implications of the court's new criteria for AI in elections.
- Centre-right
- These reports emphasized the rejection of the PT party's request and framed the decision as a necessary definition of boundaries for new communication technologies.
Sources
- Centre CNN Brasil: TSE rejects fine for Flávio and sets criteria for use of deepfake in the election
- Centre-right Estadao: TSE defines criteria for deepfake in campaign, but sees no illegality in Bolsonaro's AI
- Centre-right Estadao: Kássio votes to define criteria for deepfake and sees no illegality in Bolsonaro's AI
- Centre Folha de S.Paulo: TSE has majority to clear Flávio of fine for Bolsonaro video created with AI
- Centre-right Gazeta do Povo: TSE rejects punishing Flávio for video of Bolsonaro with AI
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.