the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

CIA Declassifies Extensive Intelligence Briefings on Bin Laden Prior to 9/11

7 sources across 6 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • MS NOW United States · Left · Versant (spun off from NBCUniversal)
  • CNN United States · Centre-left · Warner Bros. Discovery
  • CNN Brasil Brazil · Centre · Rubens Menin (MRV)
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The CIA has released dozens of declassified presidential daily briefs detailing intelligence gathered on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda in the years leading up to the September 11, 2001, attacks. CIA Director John Ratcliffe described the release as the agency's single largest disclosure of such highly classified briefings. The documents, which span from February 1998 to September 12, 2001, were provided to the administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Among the most notable revelations is a September 10, 1998, report stating that bin Laden's preferred option was to strike the United States in Washington and that al-Qaeda might fly an explosive-packed airplane into a US city. Other documents from December 1998 mention that some members of the bin Laden network had received hijack training and that conspirators had evaded security checks during a trial run at an unidentified New York airport. The briefings also track bin Laden's pursuit of chemical, biological, and nuclear materials, including the pursuit of dirty bombs.

In the months immediately preceding the attacks, a briefing dated August 6, 2001, was titled Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US. This document noted that al-Qaeda members had traveled to or resided in the US for years and that the FBI was conducting approximately 70 field investigations related to bin Laden. The final document in the release, dated September 12, 2001, cites a source in Kandahar who claimed the attacks were the result of two years of planning.

While the release is historically significant, multiple reports note that the documents do not fundamentally change the existing understanding of what the US government knew. They reinforce the 2004 findings of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, which concluded that while intelligence agencies warned two administrations of the threat, they failed to adequately communicate the urgency and scope of the danger. Some sources attribute these failures to a siloed intelligence apparatus and a period of institutional uncertainty for the CIA following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Outlets with different political leanings framed the significance of these documents differently. Center-right sources emphasized that the documents provide an unsettling view of information that two heads of state saw but failed to act upon. Left-leaning sources framed the release as a chronological timeline of flashing warning signs that were missed by multiple administrations, specifically questioning why airport security was not increased after the 1998 hijacking warnings.

How each side framed it

Left
These outlets framed the documents as evidence of a consistent drumbeat of warnings that were ignored by the government.
Centre-left
These outlets focused on the transparency of the release and the historical context of intelligence failures.
Centre
These outlets emphasized the institutional struggles of the CIA and the corroboration of the 9/11 Commission's findings.
Centre-right
These outlets highlighted the failure of two different presidents to act on specific, premonitory warnings.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.