the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Delhi Court Grants Interim Bail to Right-Wing Influencer Swatantra Bharadwaj

4 sources across 2 countries · India · Bangladesh

Who reported this

  • Scroll.in India · Left · Scroll Media Inc, reader-funded
  • The Indian Express India · Centre · Indian Express Group (Goenka family)
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)
  • The Daily Star Bangladesh · Centre · Mediaworld Ltd

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A Delhi court has granted three weeks of interim bail to Swatantra Bharadwaj, a right-wing influencer accused of assaulting the father of a student activist. The order was issued by Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler, who set the bail bond and surety at 50,000 rupees each. Bharadwaj had been in judicial custody since September 4 after being detained in Bulandshahr.

The incident occurred on July 23 at Jantar Mantar during protests against alleged irregularities in competitive examinations. Sanjay Kumar, the father of activist Nishu Aazad, was allegedly assaulted during the event. Bharadwaj was arrested following the circulation of a video in which he purportedly claimed to have cracked Kumar's skull and suggested that a phone call from Delhi minister Kapil Mishra helped him avoid initial detention. In response, Bharadwaj has claimed he acted in self-defence to avoid being lynched by a mob.

The legal proceedings involve charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and criminal intimidation. While the Delhi Police initially described the injuries to the victim as simple in nature, members of the Cockroach Janta Party protested for more severe charges, including attempt to murder. Additionally, a separate case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act has been registered against Bharadwaj. His legal counsel previously expressed concerns that he could be attacked by anti-national elements while in Tihar Jail.

How each side framed it

Left
The reporting emphasized the influencer's Hindutva ideology and the political nature of the protests.
Centre
The reporting focused on the court's procedural comments regarding the time spent in custody.
Centre-right
The reporting highlighted the influencer's claims of self-defence and his lawyer's warnings about his safety in jail.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.