the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Delhi High Court suggests CJP leaders remove posts in Gaurav Bhatia defamation suit

2 sources · India

Who reported this

  • Scroll.in India · Left · Scroll Media Inc, reader-funded
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from India.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday suggested that Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka voluntarily remove social media posts targeting BJP national spokesperson and senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia. In response to the court's suggestion, Das and Ranka undertook to delete the content within 24 hours. The legal dispute stems from a defamation suit filed by Bhatia, which includes a claim for two crore rupees. The suit concerns an AI generated image shared by Das and Ranka on September 5 that allegedly attributed statements to Bhatia calling Swatantra Bhardwaj a dimaagi naxali and jaatiwaadi. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed that while young people have a right to express themselves, attacking others without verification is not correct and that expressions should be put in a more articulate manner. The court declined to grant a dynamic injunction to restrain the defendants from posting further content but directed Meta and X to take down identical posts in the future if flagged by Bhatia. The court also issued summons to Das, Ranka, and CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke. During the proceedings, the court noted that Bhatia could have explored resolving the matter amicably instead of filing a case, a proposal Bhatia declined. Following the hearing, Das stated on X that the deletion was voluntary to avoid spending time in court, while Bhatia responded to the development on X with the phrase: No comments.

How each side framed it

Left
This report focused on the court's suggestion for voluntary deletion and the observation that the plaintiff could have resolved the matter without litigation.
Centre-right
These reports emphasized the court's criticism of the defendants' lack of verification and highlighted the ongoing war of words between the parties.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.