the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Five EU Nations Advance Plans for Migrant Return Hubs Outside Europe

6 sources across 4 countries · Germany · Italy · Netherlands · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Sueddeutsche Zeitung Germany · Centre-left · Sudwestdeutsche Medien Holding
  • Deutsche Welle Germany · Centre · Public · German federal public-law corporation
  • ANSA Italy · Centre · Publisher cooperative
  • NRC Netherlands · Centre · Mediahuis
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Five European Union countries are working to establish detention centers, referred to as return hubs, in non EU nations to house migrants whose asylum requests have been rejected. Germany, Denmark, Greece, Austria, and the Netherlands met in Copenhagen on Friday to coordinate the initiative. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt stated that the group aims to reach an agreement with partner countries by the end of 2024. Danish Migrations Minister Morten Bodskov added that Denmark expects to transfer its first irregular migrants to a partner country by 2027.

While the ministers did not officially name the potential partner countries, multiple reports indicate that Rwanda and Uganda are being considered. The ministers described the hubs as a means to break the business model of human smugglers and reduce illegal immigration. Dutch Minister Bart van den Brink described the facilities as open areas where people can live and work safely, while Bodskov framed the hubs as a second chance for those who cannot return to their home countries.

The legality and ethics of the plan are subjects of significant debate. Center left sources frame the initiative as a problematic shift toward the criminalization of migration, citing warnings from human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Save the Children regarding potential torture and violations of children's rights. These sources also highlight the failure of a similar UK scheme and ongoing legal challenges to Italy's deal with Albania. Conversely, center sources emphasize the ministers' assertions that the hubs will operate according to international law and are necessary to relieve the burden on domestic populations. The group is scheduled to meet again in Munich at the end of September.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the human rights risks and characterized the plan as a problematic or ineffective shift in migration policy.
Centre
These outlets focused on the logistical goals of the ministers and the legal arguments surrounding the hubs.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.