Former Hong Kong Alliance leaders appear for mitigation hearing after national security convictions
2 sources · Hong Kong
Who reported this
- Hong Kong Free Press
- South China Morning Post
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Hong Kong.
Former leaders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China appeared before the West Kowloon Law Courts Building on Friday for a mitigation hearing. Chow Hang-tung, Lee Cheuk-yan, and Albert Ho were convicted of inciting subversion under a Beijing-imposed national security law. The judges stated that sentencing will occur within two weeks.
Representing herself, Chow Hang-tung argued that the court's decision implies that pursuing democracy is a crime. She stated that anyone believing in ending one-party rule in mainland China has nowhere left to stand. High Court judge Alex Lee interrupted her during her statement, asking if she intended to mitigate and whether she would continue to persist in her views.
Barrister Erik Shum, representing Lee and Ho, requested that the court place the two activists in a lower sentencing band, which would result in less than five years in prison. Shum argued that the goal of ending one-party rule was an empty slogan and that the group had no concrete plan, roadmap, or timeline to oust the government. He further noted that the incitement did not lead to substantial destruction.
Reports of the hearing differ in their framing of the proceedings. A center-left source focused on Chow's assertions that the law criminalizes the pursuit of democracy and noted that the ruling has been condemned by the United Nations and rights groups. A center-right source focused on the defense's argument that the group's goals were merely slogans rather than actual plans to overthrow the government.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Framed the event as a suppression of democratic pursuits and highlighted international condemnation of the ruling.
- Centre-right
- Framed the event around the legal defense that the activists' goals were empty slogans without concrete plans.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.