Indian National Sentenced to Over Two Years Jail for Chinatown Diamond Heist
2 sources · Singapore · 2 of them are linked to a state
Who reported this
- CNA
- The Straits Times
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from Singapore.
Serasiya Milan Ramnikbhai, a 30 year old Indian national, was sentenced to 26 months and two weeks in jail on September 1 for his role in the theft of a diamond valued at nearly S$200,000. The 4.95 carat gemstone, worth US$154,000, was stolen from Dianoche Diamonds Jewelry in Chinatown on June 19.
Court proceedings revealed that Ramnikbhai and his accomplice, 41 year old Mangroliya Manojkumar Kurjibha, commissioned a counterfeit diamond in Surat, India, that matched the specifications and serial number of the target stone. Upon arriving in Singapore as tourists, the pair visited the store at approximately 3 p.m. While Kurjibha distracted the sales manager by asking to see other items, Ramnikbhai spat a fake gem from his mouth and swapped it for the real diamond, which he then concealed in his mouth.
The theft was captured on closed circuit television footage. The sales manager discovered the counterfeit stone using an identification machine and alerted the police. Both men were arrested at Changi Airport while attempting to clear immigration for a flight back to India. The genuine diamond was recovered from Ramnikbhai's haversack.
Kurjibha received the same jail term in July. Ramnikbhai's lawyers argued that Kurjibha, who worked in the gem industry, hatched the plan, sourced the fake diamond, and paid for the travel. They noted that Ramnikbhai knew nothing of the gem trade and is the sole breadwinner for his wife and six month old son. The prosecution sought a sentence based on the principle of parity, stating there was no material difference in culpability between the two men.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- The report focused on the specific legal arguments regarding parity in sentencing and the personal circumstances of the defendant.
- Centre-right
- The report emphasized the status of the offenders as tourists and provided more detail on the technical method used by the store to detect the fake gem.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.