the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Israeli Culture Minister Seeks to Revoke Citizenship of Award Winning Filmmakers

15 sources across 12 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • La Tercera Chile · Centre-right · Copesa (Saieh family)
  • El Espectador Colombia · Centre-left · Grupo Santo Domingo
  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • Aftenposten Norway · Centre-right · Schibsted, Tinius Trust foundation
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA
  • Taipei Times Taiwan · Centre-left · Liberty Times Group
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Israeli Culture Minister Miki Zohar announced on Sunday that he will work to revoke the citizenship of Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the directors of the documentary NAZA. The filmmakers received the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival for their work, which alleges that the Israel Defense Forces used artificial intelligence systems to conduct systematic mass killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Zohar accused the creators of treason and stated they were willing to harm their homeland to receive applause from antisemites. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir also criticized the directors, calling them a disgrace to the Israeli people and suggesting they would be welcomed by Hamas.

The documentary features anonymous testimonies from 24 Israeli military and intelligence personnel. It explains that the title NAZA is an acronym used by Israeli intelligence to refer to expected collateral damage, or civilian deaths, during airstrikes. The film received a standing ovation of approximately 25 minutes at its premiere. Abraham and Szor previously co directed No Other Land, a film about settler violence in the West Bank that won an Oscar in 2025.

The Israel Defense Forces categorically rejected the film's claims. Military officials stated that decisions regarding bombing targets are made by humans rather than AI and criticized the use of anonymous sources whose identities cannot be verified. Legal experts noted that while stripping citizenship is possible under Israeli law for acts of treason or terrorism, it is a rarely applied measure that requires approval from the interior and justice ministers as well as judicial validation.

Reporting on the event varied by political lean. Center left and left leaning outlets framed the story as a clash between artistic bravery and government suppression, emphasizing the film's revelations about systemic crimes. Center and center right outlets focused on the accusations of treason and the legal debate over citizenship. Far right perspectives, as cited in several reports, framed the filmmakers as traitors and agents of self hatred.

How each side framed it

Left
Emphasized the necessity of confronting the reality of the Gaza war and the importance of distributing the film within Israel.
Centre-left
Highlighted the systemic nature of the killings described in the film and the filmmakers' risks.
Centre
Presented the conflict as a dispute between the filmmakers' allegations and the government's accusations of disloyalty.
Centre-right
Focused on the accusations of treason and the potential legal mechanisms for revoking citizenship.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.