the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Nottingham Forest Manager and Player Dispute VAR Decision in Draw With Tottenham

3 sources · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter
  • The Telegraph United Kingdom · Centre-right · RedBird Capital Partners

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from United Kingdom.

Nottingham Forest manager Oliver Glasner and defender Neco Williams have criticized a VAR decision that disallowed a goal during a 0-0 draw against Tottenham. Referee Craig Pawson initially awarded the goal to Williams, but VAR official Peter Bankes intervened. The Premier League later explained that the goal was ruled out because Williams handled the ball immediately before scoring, which is a violation of the rules regardless of whether the touch was accidental. Williams denied the handball, stating that he headed the ball in between his arms.

Glasner argued that the VAR was guessing and that the intervention lacked the necessary clear and obvious evidence. He noted that while one angle might suggest the ball touched the arm because the shirt moved, it remained unclear if the contact was with the ball or Tottenham player Sandro Tonali. Glasner claimed that the threshold for VAR intervention should be high to avoid weakening the authority of on-field referees.

Coverage of the incident varied by political lean. Center and center-left reports focused on the technical dispute over the rules and the specific arguments made by Glasner and Williams. In contrast, the center-right coverage framed the incident as a symptom of a larger problem, describing VAR as a scourge and the decision as off-field meddling. The match was otherwise described as underwhelming, with Tottenham failing to record a shot on target.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Highlighted the manager's arguments regarding referee authority and provided broader match context.
Centre
Focused on the factual dispute and the technical application of the handball rule.
Centre-right
Framed the VAR intervention as an example of systemic failure and meddling.

Sources

93% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.