the news now
This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Pentagon Report Records 153 Civilian Deaths in 2025 Operations

2 sources across 2 countries · Israel · United States

Who reported this

  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • The Intercept United States · Left · First Look Institute (non-profit)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A Pentagon report submitted to Congress states that US military operations killed 153 civilians and wounded 243 in 2025. According to the report, these casualties resulted from three strikes in Yemen conducted by US Central Command (CENTCOM) in April 2025. The report also notes that 15 other incidents in Yemen are currently being assessed. This represents a significant increase from 2024, when the Pentagon assessed that two civilians were killed and two were injured.

The report found no civilian casualties resulting from US military operations in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific. This area of responsibility is managed by US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM). Since September 2025, the Trump administration has conducted strikes on vessels it describes as transporting narcotics, killing more than 200 people. The administration characterizes these targets as narco terrorists, while organizations such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the ACLU describe the strikes as unlawful extrajudicial killings or based on unsubstantiated claims.

Outlets with a center right lean presented the data as a formal Pentagon assessment of military operations. In contrast, outlets with a left lean framed the report as a whitewash and a joke, citing anonymous officials who claimed the numbers were lowballed and that the Pentagon failed to track civilian harm properly.

How each side framed it

Left
The report was framed as a deceptive attempt to minimize civilian casualties and a failure of government accountability.
Centre-right
The report was framed as a factual summary of official Pentagon assessments and military objectives.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.