Police Reopen Investigation Into Justice Minister Nominee Kim Seung-won
2 sources · South Korea · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- Yonhap
- The Korea Herald
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Every source for this story reports from South Korea.
The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency has reopened an investigation into allegations that Justice Minister nominee Kim Seung-won engaged in illegal lobbying in 2021. The case, assigned to the Yeongdeungpo Police Station on Tuesday, follows a criminal complaint filed by a civic group. The probe focuses on allegations that Kim, a two-term lawmaker nominated by President Lee Jae Myung, asked the then head of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety to expedite the clinical trial approval for a COVID-19 drug developed by Genencell at the request of a broker surnamed Yang.
A previous investigation concluded in 2024 when prosecutors decided not to indict Kim, determining that the request could not be definitively found as illegal solicitation. However, further allegations have emerged. According to an editorial, a broker on trial for promising Kim a bribe claimed that Kim provided his bank account number for a political donation. Additionally, reports mention a 2022 photograph showing Kim with the Genencell founder and a judge who had previously denied an arrest warrant for the founder. There are also concerns regarding stock price fluctuations of Sejong Medical, Genencell's largest shareholder, around the time of the trial approval.
Kim Seung-won has denied any wrongdoing. He maintains that he merely conveyed a public-interest grievance and notes that the previous three-year investigation was conducted under former President Yoon Suk Yeol. While center-leaning coverage emphasizes the unanswered questions regarding Kim's fitness for office and potential links to stock manipulation, center-right coverage focuses on the procedural facts of the police reopening the probe.
How each side framed it
- Centre
- Framed the event as a matter of fitness for office, highlighting specific suspicious details like bank accounts and social ties to suggest a need for reinvestigation.
- Centre-right
- Framed the event as a legal development, focusing on the police reopening the case following a civic group's complaint.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.