the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Spanish Supreme Court Suspends Voting Rights for Some Naturalized Citizens Under Grandchildren Law

2 sources across 2 countries · Argentina · Spain

Who reported this

  • elDiarioAR Argentina · Centre-left · Newsroom-majority owned, membership funded
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every outlet covering this story shares the same political lean; read with that in mind.

The Supreme Court of Spain has issued a precautionary measure suspending the registration in the electoral census for individuals who obtained Spanish nationality through the so called grandchildren law. This decision prevents these individuals from voting in upcoming elections unless they can provide a specific certification from Consular Registries proving they are descendants of exiles who left Spain for political, ideological, religious, or sexual orientation reasons. The measure affects both those currently processing their registration in the Census of Absent Residents Abroad and those already registered under this law.

The ruling follows a request by the party Vox and Iustitia Europa to suspend registrations until a final judgment on the merits of the case is reached. While the measure halts the right to vote, it does not affect the actual granting of nationality. The Fiscalía and the Abogacía del Estado opposed the suspension, arguing that the electoral office should not be tasked with qualifying legal acts like nationality, which is a prerequisite for the right to suffrage.

Center left sources frame the event as a conflict between the judiciary and the executive, describing the court's action as a provocation and a result of conspiracy theories regarding electoral engineering. These sources highlight the bureaucratic difficulty of the certification process and suggest the ruling creates two categories of citizenship.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
Outlets with a center left lean framed the decision as a political attack by the court and right wing parties to disenfranchise descendants of exiles based on unfounded theories of electoral manipulation.

Sources

89% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.