Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration's Mail Ballot Restrictions for Midterms
25 sources across 14 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state
Who reported this
- MS NOW
- CNN
- WIRED
- Associated Press
- Bloomberg
- Wall Street Journal
- Der Spiegel
- Sueddeutsche Zeitung
- Deutsche Welle
- Frankfurter Allgemeine
- Clarin
- La Nacion
- Le Monde
- France 24
- The Guardian
- Reuters
- The Daily Star
- Politico Europe
- Folha de S.Paulo
- South China Morning Post
- The Japan Times
- Aftenposten
- Al Jazeera
- The Korea Herald
- El Pais
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
The US Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request from the Trump administration to allow the US Postal Service to enforce new restrictions on mail in ballots for the upcoming congressional midterm elections. The court's decision leaves in place a lower court injunction that had blocked the federal government from implementing the rules. In a brief, unsigned order, the majority stated that the administration was unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge and that equitable factors did not favor a stay. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion, noted that while the rules might be legal in the long run, state and local election officials did not have sufficient time to reasonably implement them before the elections. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, with Alito arguing that the Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail and that the government has a strong interest in detecting election fraud. The disputed rules, stemming from a March executive order, would have required states to use specific envelope designs and provide lists of eligible voters to the Postal Service, which could then refuse to deliver ballots that did not meet these standards. Opponents, including a coalition of Democratic led states and voting rights groups, argued the rules were unconstitutional and would cause chaos or disenfranchise millions of voters. The Trump administration maintained the measures were necessary to combat voter fraud. This legal battle occurs as some states have already begun sending out mail in ballots. The decision is viewed as a significant setback for President Trump, who has frequently criticized mail in voting without providing evidence of widespread fraud, despite having used mail in ballots himself.
How each side framed it
- Left
- These outlets framed the administration's actions as an unconstitutional power grab and a threat to democracy.
- Centre-left
- These outlets emphasized the risk of mass disenfranchisement and framed the move as an attempt to sabotage the election.
- Centre
- These outlets focused on the legal outcome and the practical implications for election administration.
- Centre-right
- These outlets highlighted the resolution of uncertainty for election officials and the legal arguments regarding the Postal Service's authority.
Sources
- Centre-right Aftenposten: Trump wanted to limit mail in votes: Supreme Court said no
- Centre-left Al Jazeera: US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms
- Centre Associated Press: Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms - AP News
- Centre Bloomberg: Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Mail Ballot Curbs for Midterms
- Centre-left CNN: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s plan to limit mail-in voting in midterms
- Centre-left CNN: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s plan to limit mail-in voting in midterms
- Centre-right Clarin: US Supreme Court allows mail-in voting as normal and clears uncertainty
- Centre-left Der Spiegel: Donald Trump: Supreme Court lets President fail in dispute over mail-in voting
- Centre Deutsche Welle: US Supreme Court denies Trump bid to restrict mail-in ballots
- Centre-left El Pais: The Supreme Court rejects Trump's restrictions on mail in voting before the legislative elections
- Centre Folha de S.Paulo: In defeat to Trump, US Supreme Court denies request to restrict mail in voting
- Centre France 24: The Supreme Court thwarts Donald Trump's plans on mail in voting
- Centre-right Frankfurter Allgemeine: USA under Trump: Supreme Court stops Trump's anti-mail-in voting plans
- Centre-right La Nacion: The US Supreme Court rejected Trump's request to restrict mail-in voting
- Centre-left Le Monde: In the United States, the Supreme Court rejects an appeal by the Trump administration against mail-in voting
- Left MS NOW: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s mail-ballot restrictions for midterms
- Centre Politico Europe: Supreme Court blocks Trump mail-in ballot plan
- Centre Reuters: In loss for Trump, US Supreme Court won't let Postal Service restrict mail ballots - reuters.com
- Centre-right South China Morning Post: US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions for midterms
- Centre-left Sueddeutsche Zeitung: Supreme Court: Supreme Court stops Trump at the last moment
- Centre The Daily Star: US Supreme Court blocks Trump mail-in ballot restrictions
- Centre-left The Guardian: Supreme court rejects Trump’s mail ballot restrictions for midterm elections
- Centre The Japan Times: U.S. Supreme Court blocks Postal Service restriction on mail ballots
- Centre-right The Korea Herald: US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms
- Centre-left WIRED: The Supreme Court Just Blocked Trump’s Efforts to Control Mail-In Voting for the Midterms
- Centre-right Wall Street Journal: Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s New Mail Ballot Requirements for Midterms
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.