the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Supreme Court declines to restrict Cockroach Janta Party march in Delhi

2 sources · India

Who reported this

  • Scroll.in India · Left · Scroll Media Inc, reader-funded
  • Hindustan Times India · Centre-right · HT Media (KK Birla group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from India.

The Supreme Court of India on Monday declined to interfere with a proposed protest march by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) scheduled for September 5 in Delhi. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that there were no compelling circumstances to presume the mobilization would turn violent and expressed confidence that participants would behave in a peaceful and lawful manner. The court ruled that the responsibility for maintaining law and order rests with the Centre and the Delhi government, noting that such matters fall outside the court's immediate judicial domain.

The decision follows a petition filed by retired Delhi police officer Rajendra Singh and Shivam Upadhyay. The petitioners sought restrictions on large scale demonstrations in security sensitive areas of Lutyens' Delhi, including India Gate and Central Vista. They specifically requested that the march be postponed until after the BRICS Summit, which is scheduled for September 12 and 13, arguing that any unrest could attract negative international attention.

The CJP has called for the march from India Gate to the Delhi Police headquarters. According to reports, the group claims the Union government failed to honor commitments made on July 25. This follows a period of unrest beginning June 6 over the alleged mismanagement of competitive examinations, which led to protests and the eventual resignation of the Union education minister on July 25.

While the court refused to stop the march, it indicated that the matter could be brought back before the bench if an alarming situation arose that fell within the court's core judicial domain. The case is scheduled to be heard again on September 10.

How each side framed it

Left
The reporting provided extensive context on the history of the protests and the police crackdown on demonstrators.
Centre-right
The reporting focused on the legal arguments regarding law and order and the potential security risks associated with the BRICS Summit.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.