the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Supreme Court Lifts Block on Trump Executive Order Regarding Mail-In Ballots

morning · · thread: Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court Over Mail-In Voting Restrictions

16 sources across 11 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • MS NOW United States · Left · Versant (spun off from NBCUniversal)
  • CNN United States · Centre-left · Warner Bros. Discovery
  • Associated Press United States · Centre · Non-profit news cooperative
  • Bloomberg United States · Centre · Bloomberg L.P. (Michael Bloomberg)
  • Wall Street Journal United States · Centre-right · News Corp (Murdoch family trust)
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • UOL Brazil · Centre-left · Grupo Folha
  • Sueddeutsche Zeitung Germany · Centre-left · Sudwestdeutsche Medien Holding
  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Corriere della Sera Italy · Centre-right · RCS MediaGroup (Cairo Communication)
  • The Japan Times Japan · Centre · News2u Holdings
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Daily Maverick South Africa · Centre-left · Reader-funded
  • The Korea Herald South Korea · Centre-right · Herald Corporation (Yeongpoong Group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The US Supreme Court on Monday lifted a lower court injunction that had blocked the Trump administration from implementing an executive order to restrict mail-in voting ahead of the November midterm elections. In an unsigned opinion, the court's 6-3 conservative majority ruled that a district court in Massachusetts lacked jurisdiction to bar the government from trying to implement the order, stating that the states who sued had not yet demonstrated a direct harm. The court explicitly noted that this procedural decision does not determine the ultimate legality of the order, stating that time will tell whether the measures taken to implement it are lawful.

Signed in March, the executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of eligible US citizens and requires the US Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to individuals on those lists. It also instructs the Justice Department to prioritize the prosecution of election officials who issue ballots to ineligible voters and suggests withholding federal funding from noncompliant states. While the court lifted the June injunction brought by a coalition of 23 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, it did not act on a separate August injunction that blocks the US Postal Service from enforcing tighter rules nationwide.

The three liberal justices dissented from the ruling. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the decision injects chaos and uncertainty into the midterms, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the states should not be forced to wait to challenge the order. Democratic officials, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and New York Attorney General Letitia James, have vowed to continue legal challenges. The White House described the ruling as a major win for election security and the protection of American leadership.

How each side framed it

Left
These outlets framed the decision as a result of a GOP-appointed majority and highlighted the dissenting justices' warnings of a legal nightmare.
Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the potential for voter disenfranchisement and the risk of chaos leading up to the elections.
Centre
These outlets presented the ruling as a temporary or partial victory while highlighting the ongoing legal uncertainty.
Centre-right
These outlets focused on the procedural nature of the win and the administration's goal of ensuring election integrity.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.