the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court Over Mail-In Ballot Rules

12 sources across 7 countries

Who reported this

  • MS NOW United States · Left · Versant (spun off from NBCUniversal)
  • CNN United States · Centre-left · Warner Bros. Discovery
  • Associated Press United States · Centre · Non-profit news cooperative
  • Bloomberg United States · Centre · Bloomberg L.P. (Michael Bloomberg)
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Sueddeutsche Zeitung Germany · Centre-left · Sudwestdeutsche Medien Holding
  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany · Centre-right · FAZIT-Stiftung (foundation)
  • Folha de S.Paulo Brazil · Centre · Grupo Folha (Frias family)
  • Le Monde France · Centre-left · Fonds pour l'independance de la presse
  • South China Morning Post Hong Kong · Centre-right · Alibaba Group
  • The Japan Times Japan · Centre · News2u Holdings
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal with the US Supreme Court on Thursday, seeking to allow the US Postal Service (USPS) to enforce new, stricter rules for mail-in ballots ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. The request asks the high court to lift a temporary order from US District Judge Indira Talwani, who blocked the rules last week. Judge Talwani stated that the regulations were likely unconstitutional and practically impossible for states to implement so close to the election. In some states, such as North Carolina, mail-in ballots are scheduled to be sent as early as this Friday.

The new USPS regulations would require state election officials to provide the Postal Service with lists of voters receiving ballots and to use approved envelopes featuring unique barcodes. The USPS would have the authority to refuse the delivery of ballots that do not comply with these standards. The administration, represented by Solicitor General D. John Sauer, argues that these are modest requirements necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure a secure election. This is the second time the administration has turned to the Supreme Court on this issue; in August, the court lifted a previous injunction on procedural grounds without ruling on the legality of the plan.

Opponents of the measure, including a coalition of 23 Democratic-led states and voter advocacy groups, argue that the rules are an unconstitutional power grab that could disenfranchise millions of voters. A whistleblower report cited by some sources suggests the USPS is rushing a complicated plan that could prevent ballots from arriving on time. The Supreme Court has requested a response by Tuesday morning, indicating it may not reach an immediate decision.

How each side framed it

Left
These outlets framed the appeal as an emergency created by the administration to restrict voting rights.
Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the rarity of voter fraud and framed the move as an attempt to disadvantage Democratic voters.
Centre
These outlets focused on the procedural legal battle and the potential for logistical havoc in the states.
Centre-right
These outlets highlighted the Republican goal of preventing fraud while noting the political tension surrounding the midterms.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.