Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Reinstate Voter Verification Database
2 sources across 2 countries · United Kingdom · United States
Who reported this
- Reuters
- CNN
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
President Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to reinstate the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, a citizenship records system that was previously blocked by a lower court. The Trump administration seeks to use the Department of Homeland Security program to conduct reviews of state voter rolls to identify non citizens. US Solicitor General John Sauer argued in the filing that the lower court ruling threatens the integrity of upcoming elections.
US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan blocked the program in June, stating that the federal government violated privacy laws and threatened the right to vote. The lawsuit was filed by voter advocates after the administration expanded the program to allow states to upload voter lists in bulk and include Social Security records. Previously, the system was limited to individualized citizenship checks.
While Republican led states have expressed interest in using the system, some acknowledge that further investigation is required before removing voters from rolls. Critics argue the system produces inaccurate results that could lead to the disenfranchisement of eligible citizens, citing evidence from Texas where citizens were wrongly purged. The Department of Justice has countered that the responsibility for following registration laws during purges lies with election officials rather than the federal government.
Framing of the event differs by political lean. A center source describes the action as a request to allow a voter verification database. A center left source frames the system as a controversial tool used for voter purges and notes that claims of widespread non citizen voting have been debunked by numerous studies.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- The center-left source frames the database as a tool for controversial voter purges and emphasizes the potential for disenfranchising eligible citizens.
- Centre
- The center source presents the event as a legal request to allow a verification database without adding critical context regarding the system's accuracy.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.