Twelve Western Nations Impose Sanctions on Israeli West Bank Settlements
6 sources across 4 countries · Israel · France · United Kingdom · United States
Who reported this
- Haaretz
- The Times of Israel
- The Jerusalem Post
- France 24
- The Guardian
- Al-Monitor
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Twelve Western states, led by the United Kingdom, have announced an import ban on goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband described the violence of Israeli settlers as ethnic cleansing and stated that the government will refuse license applications for arms and other exports that materially contribute to the occupation. France and Canada joined the sanctions, while nine other Western nations voiced their support. Israel responded by ordering the closure of the British consulate in Jerusalem. In the UK, the move has caused a split within the Jewish community: Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis condemned the measures as political posturing, while progressive and Masorti rabbis argued that criticizing settlements is necessary to combat violence and should not be conflated with an attack on Jews. In Israel, analysts suggest the sanctions may have limited economic impact because settlement goods are a small fraction of the economy and are difficult to distinguish from other Israeli products. However, some observers warn that the timing could embolden the Israeli right ahead of the October 27 elections. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has stated that a Reform government would undo the damage done to the UK Israel relationship under Labour. While US Ambassador Mike Huckabee accused Miliband of Jew hate, President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have not criticized the move.
How each side framed it
- Left
- Highlighted the internal division within the Jewish community regarding the legitimacy of the sanctions.
- Centre-left
- Framed the sanctions as a hard won victory for activists and a necessary first step toward a full arms embargo.
- Centre
- Analyzed the potential for the sanctions to be instrumentalized by the Israeli right for electoral gain.
- Centre-right
- Emphasized the necessity of the sanctions to combat settler violence that contradicts Jewish values.
Sources
- Centre Al-Monitor: Will Israel's right exploit sanctions in run-up to vote?
- Centre France 24: West Bank: sanctions against Israeli settlements
- Left Haaretz: Dozens of U.K. Jews protest sanctions on West Bank settlements as community split over measures
- Centre-left The Guardian: Labour shifts on Israel, but what difference will it make? – podcast
- Centre-left The Guardian: The UK’s sanctions on Israeli settlements are a great victory – but must be only the beginning | Em Hilton
- Centre-right The Jerusalem Post: Reform UK would 'undo' Labour’s damage to Israel ties, Nigel Farage tells 'Post'
- Centre The Times of Israel: Progressive UK rabbis say West Bank sanctions necessary to combat settler violence
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.