the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

US EPA Repeals Greenhouse Gas Emission Limits for Power Plants

11 sources across 7 countries · 1 of them is linked to a state

Who reported this

  • CNN United States · Centre-left · Warner Bros. Discovery
  • Associated Press United States · Centre · Non-profit news cooperative
  • Wall Street Journal United States · Centre-right · News Corp (Murdoch family trust)
  • Asahi Shimbun Japan · Centre-left · Asahi Shimbun Company (family and employee held)
  • The Japan Times Japan · Centre · News2u Holdings
  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • Politico Europe Belgium · Centre · Axel Springer SE
  • Der Spiegel Germany · Centre-left · ~50% staff-owned
  • Al Jazeera Qatar · Centre-left · State-affiliated · Qatari government funded
  • Business Day South Africa · Centre-right · Arena Holdings (Lebashe Investment Group)

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has repealed regulations that limited greenhouse gas emissions from coal and natural gas power plants. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the decision on Monday during a G20 ministerial meeting on energy abundance in Houston, Texas. The move rescinds 2024 standards from the Biden administration that would have required certain coal and new gas plants to capture and store most of their carbon emissions underground.

In addition to the repeal, the EPA proposed a separate rule that would strip the agency of its legal authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants under the Clean Air Act. This supplemental proposal aims to prevent future administrations from reinstating such standards. The action follows a February repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding, which had previously established that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare.

The Trump administration argues that the repeal will unleash American energy, reduce electricity prices for consumers, and remove billions of dollars in compliance costs for the industry. EPA estimates suggest the changes could save the industry over 300 billion dollars. Conversely, environmental and public health groups argue the move is reckless and will lead to increased pollution and health risks. Some reports cite an Associated Press examination suggesting the previous rules could have prevented 30,000 deaths and saved 275 billion dollars annually while in effect.

Outlets with a center-left lean frame the event as a dangerous betrayal of public health and a step toward climate denial. Outlets with a center-right lean frame the event as a necessary effort to end a war on coal and ensure affordable, reliable energy. Center outlets focus on the legal shift in regulatory authority and the conflict between industrial demand and climate goals.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets framed the repeal as a reckless attack on public health and a denial of the climate crisis.
Centre
These outlets focused on the administrative process, the legal implications for the Clean Air Act, and the industry's demand for energy abundance.
Centre-right
These outlets framed the move as a victory for energy independence and a way to lower costs by ending regulatory burdens.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.