the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

US Judge Rejects Forced Sale of Google Ad Tech Business

7 sources across 5 countries

Who reported this

  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • Reuters United Kingdom · Centre · Thomson Reuters Corporation
  • Ars Technica United States · Centre · Conde Nast (Advance Publications)
  • Associated Press United States · Centre · Non-profit news cooperative
  • Telex Hungary · Centre · Reader-funded, staff-owned
  • Business Day South Africa · Centre-right · Arena Holdings (Lebashe Investment Group)
  • El Pais Spain · Centre-left · Grupo PRISA

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

A US federal judge has ruled that Google will not be forced to sell its online advertising exchange, AdX, despite a previous ruling that the company held illegal monopolies in the ad tech market. Judge Leonie Brinkema of Alexandria, Virginia, rejected the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and a coalition of states' request for the divestiture, opting instead for behavioral remedies to address the company's anticompetitive conduct. The full details of these court ordered changes to Google's business practices remain sealed for 14 days to allow for redactions of confidential information.

The case began in 2023 when the DOJ and several states sued Google over its dominance in advertising technology. In April 2025, Judge Brinkema ruled that Google had illegally locked publishers into using its exchange and maintained illegal monopolies on servers that host publisher ads. The DOJ argued that Google could not be trusted to run the exchange given its past behavior. Google countered that a forced sale would be technically difficult and would harm customers during a painful transition.

Financial data from 2020 cited in court documents indicates that Ad Manager represented 4.1 percent of Google's overall revenue and 1.5 percent of its operating profit. While the ad exchange is a relatively small part of Google's total business, the ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the company. Google executive Lee Anne Mulholland stated the company was pleased the court rejected the proposal to break apart tools that help small businesses grow. The DOJ stated it was pleased the court ordered substantial relief and is evaluating next steps.

This decision marks the third consecutive time US antitrust enforcers have failed to secure a breakup of a Big Tech firm. Previous rejected attempts include the Federal Trade Commission's bid to force Meta to sell Instagram and WhatsApp, and a separate effort to force Google to sell the Chrome browser. Cases against Amazon and Apple are not expected to go to trial until 2027 at the earliest.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These outlets emphasized the symbolic victory for Google and questioned whether courts are capable of checking the power of the tech industry.
Centre
These outlets focused on the legal specifics and the broader trend of Big Tech firms successfully resisting divestiture.
Centre-right
This outlet highlighted the failure of government enforcers and provided detailed financial context regarding the impact on Google's revenue.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.