US Sanctions ICC President and Senior Lawyer
2 sources across 2 countries · Philippines · United Kingdom
Who reported this
- Philippine Daily Inquirer
- The Guardian
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
The United States government has imposed sanctions on International Criminal Court President Tomoko Akane of Japan and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Seye of Senegal. The measures bar the two officials from entering the United States and from conducting transactions within the U.S. financial system. This action brings the total number of sanctioned ICC jurists to 13.
President Akane stated that she had anticipated the sanctions to an extent, but she warned that the move could lead to the demise of the international rule of law. The ICC also described the sanctions as a flagrant attack on the independence of the court.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the sanctions are a response to the ICC threatening American sovereignty, specifically objecting to the court's ability to prosecute officials from governments that have not consented to its jurisdiction. The Trump administration has characterized the ICC as a corrupt and fatally politicized body.
Reporting on the event differs based on political framing. A center lean source presents the event as a conflict over the rule of law and the court's independence, noting the sanctions follow investigations involving Israel. A center left lean source frames the sanctions as a vendetta intended to protect U.S. and Israeli officials from prosecution for war crimes, arguing that the administration is selectively applying its views on territorial jurisdiction.
How each side framed it
- Centre-left
- Framed the sanctions as a political vendetta designed to shield U.S. and Israeli war criminals from justice.
- Centre
- Framed the event as a warning about the demise of the international rule of law and a conflict over court independence.
Sources
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.