the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Yair Golan Threatens Legal Action After Sara Netanyahu Suggests He Had Prior Knowledge of October 7

4 sources across 2 countries · Israel · Switzerland

Who reported this

  • Haaretz Israel · Left · Schocken family and M. DuMont Schauberg
  • The Times of Israel Israel · Centre · Seth Klarman (majority backer)
  • The Jerusalem Post Israel · Centre-right · Mirkaei Tikshoret (Eli Azur)
  • Neue Zuercher Zeitung Switzerland · Centre-right · Dispersed shareholders, no controlling stake

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Yair Golan, chairman of the Democrats Party and former IDF deputy chief of staff, has threatened to sue Sara Netanyahu for 2.5 million shekels after she suggested he had prior knowledge of the October 7 attacks. In an interview on Channel 14, Sara Netanyahu questioned why a high ranking military officer was dressed and ready so early on the morning of the massacre, while others, including the prime minister, were not yet aware of the situation. Golan has denied the claims, describing them as a planned move to tarnish political opponents. He detailed his morning, stating he woke at 6:15 a.m. left his house at 8:30 a.m. and arrived at the Home Front Command headquarters around 9:00 a.m. before heading south to rescue people fleeing the Nova music festival.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu subsequently denied that there was any internal betrayal on October 7, though Defense Minister Israel Katz refused to explicitly rule out betrayal when questioned. Sara Netanyahu has refused to apologize and has countered with her own threat to sue Golan for 270,000 shekels if he does not retract his accusations of slander. The controversy has drawn criticism from across the political spectrum, including from right wing figures like Naftali Bennett and Gadi Eisenkot, who described the claims as a dangerous conspiracy theory.

Outlets with a center right or center lean frame the event as a political conflict involving accusations of smear campaigns and the dismantling of societal norms. In contrast, outlets with a left lean frame the incident as part of a broader effort by the Netanyahu family to demonize the center left and evade responsibility for the security failures of October 7.

How each side framed it

Left
Framed the event as a calculated effort to delegitimize the center left and avoid a formal state commission of inquiry.
Centre
Framed the event as a desperate attempt by the Prime Minister to shift blame for the October 7 failure.
Centre-right
Framed the event as a political clash over the use of conspiracy theories to tarnish opponents.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.