the news now

The world's news, cross-checked among reputable sources.

This is a new development in a story we have covered before · earlier coverage

Intelligence Agencies Reflect on 9/11 Failures and Evolving Global Threats

3 sources · United Kingdom

Who reported this

  • The Guardian United Kingdom · Centre-left · Scott Trust Limited
  • The Independent United Kingdom · Centre-left · Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel and Evgeny Lebedev
  • BBC News United Kingdom · Centre · Public · Licence fee, royal charter

What the colours mean

  • Left
  • Centre-left
  • Centre
  • Centre-right
  • Right
  • A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.

Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.

Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.

The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.

Every source for this story reports from United Kingdom.

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, which killed 2,977 people, intelligence officials and analysts are evaluating the long term impact of the tragedy and the current state of global security. The attacks are widely characterized as a colossal intelligence failure. The 9/11 Commission Report attributed this to failures of imagination, policy, capabilities, and management, noting that the CIA and FBI failed to share information that could have disrupted the plot. In the aftermath, the US intelligence community underwent a root and branch reorganization, including the creation of the National Counter Terrorism Center and the role of Director of National Intelligence to ensure better information sharing among 18 separate agencies.

Internal accounts of the CIA's response at its Langley headquarters describe a scene of confusion and chaos. One former counter intelligence officer recalled a vacuum of leadership, stating that senior figures had vacated the area while staff remained. In response, a former CIA public affairs director stated that Director George Tenet and senior leadership moved to a lower profile building to increase survival chances, while counter terrorism personnel remained in the original headquarters by accepting the risk.

While the campaigns to dismantle al Qaeda are credited with reducing the organization's capabilities to a fraction of what they were in 2001, new threats have emerged. Sir Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, has issued a call to arms, warning that Britain faces a more complex threat landscape than it did in 2001. He describes a scenario where the West faces both the persistence of radical Islamic extremists and the strategic national security threats posed by capable states, specifically Russia and China.

Perspectives on the subsequent War on Terror vary by political framing. Center left sources emphasize the soiled reputation of the CIA due to falsified intelligence regarding the invasion of Iraq and the use of torture in extraordinary rendition programs. Center sources focus on the systemic evolution of intelligence sharing, noting that while the relationship between the CIA and MI6 is now among the closest in the world, the politicization of intelligence still led to significant reputational setbacks during the Iraq War.

How each side framed it

Centre-left
These sources emphasize the moral and reputational failures of the CIA, specifically regarding torture and the Iraq War.
Centre
This source focuses on the systemic intelligence failures and the subsequent structural improvements in international cooperation.

Sources

100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.