Netanyahu and Wife Face Backlash Over October 7 Conspiracy Claims Ahead of Elections
3 sources across 2 countries · Israel · France
Who reported this
- Haaretz
- The Jerusalem Post
- Le Monde
What the colours mean
- Left
- Centre-left
- Centre
- Centre-right
- Right
- A hatched block means the outlet is affiliated with, or controlled by, a state.
Political lean describes where an outlet sits within the politics of its own country. It is never a position on a single global scale.
Political lean is comparable inside one country and not across them, which is why the bar groups by country first. Publicly funded broadcasters are not marked as state-linked.
The owner of each outlet is listed as a matter of record, not as a judgement about the outlet.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife, Sara Netanyahu, are facing criticism for promoting theories that security officials and political rivals failed to wake the Prime Minister during the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks. In a recent video, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that military officers deliberately did not wake him for over an hour, asserting that if he had been awakened at 3 a.m. the outcome would have been different. He described the events as a major failure by the military and intelligence hierarchy. Sara Netanyahu further intensified the controversy in a Channel 14 interview by suggesting that Yair Golan, leader of The Democrats party and a former deputy IDF chief of staff, may have had prior knowledge of the attack. She pointed to the fact that Golan was dressed and ready to assist early in the morning while the Prime Minister was not informed. Golan has responded by threatening a defamation lawsuit against Sara Netanyahu. Other political figures, including Yashar party chief Gadi Eisenkot, have dismissed these claims as attempts to divide the public and avoid accountability for the security failure. While Benjamin Netanyahu has stated in a separate video that he does not believe there was a betrayal, he continues to maintain that he was not woken up in time. The discourse is occurring less than two months before the October 27 elections.
How each side framed it
- Left
- Characterized the claims as a new conspiracy theory and questioned whether waking the Prime Minister earlier would have actually changed the outcome.
- Centre-left
- Framed the Prime Minister's claims as a deliberate attempt to rewrite history and shift personal responsibility onto the military.
- Centre-right
- Highlighted the toxicity of the election mudslinging and the lack of evidence for treason theories while noting the political strategy involved.
Sources
- Left Haaretz: Netanyahu spoke to no one when he was woken up on October 7. So, what did he do?
- Centre-left Le Monde: "Netanyahu, how many years have you been sleeping?": in Israel, the very political battle of the memory of October 7
- Centre-right The Jerusalem Post: Israel's election mudslinging hits a new low with toxic October 7 treason theories - editorial
- Centre-right The Jerusalem Post: How Sara Netanyahu’s October 7 remark successfully hijacked the Israeli election agenda - analysis
100% of the statements in this article were traced back to the source articles listed above.